...and BMAL1 stabilize and activate RHOA to promote F-actin...

来自 : 发布时间：2024-05-12

CLOCK and BMAL1 stabilize and activate RHOA to promote F-actin formation in cancer cells AbstractCircadian genes control most of the physiological functions in cancer cells, including cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. The CLOCK and BMAL1 complex plays a central role in circadian rhythms. Previous studies have shown that circadian genes may act as oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes. In addition, F-actin, regulated by RHOA, has been shown to participate in tumor progression. However, the roles of the CLOCK and BMAL1 genes in the regulation of tumor progression via the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway remain largely unclear. Here we first indicate that the rearrangement of F-actin is regulated by CLOCK and BMAL1. We found that CLOCK and BMAL1 can upregulate RHOA expression by inhibiting CUL3-mediated ubiquitination and activate RHOA by reducing the interaction between RHOA and RhoGDI. Consequently, CLOCK and BMAL1 control the expression of the components of the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway, which alters the dynamics of F-actin/G-actin turnover and promotes cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. In conclusion, our research proposes a novel insight into the role of CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells. IntroductionThe circadian rhythm, a ubiquitous mechanism, enables organisms to maintain temporal coordination between endogenous biological processes and the ambient environment1. Circadian clocks display oscillations with a periodicity of almost 24鈥塰 that matches the day鈥搉ight cycle and can be found in most bodily tissues. These clocks control a wide variety of biological processes in organisms, including two hallmarks of cancer: cell division and metabolism2. Research has shown that the disruption of circadian timekeeping is associated with uncontrolled cell growth and cancer3,4. Additionally, circadian genes have also been shown to interact with oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes in tumorigenesis5. In mammals, the molecular mechanism of the biological clock is based on transcriptional/translational autoregulatory feedback loops, which are composed of a set of clock genes. Two transcription factors, CLOCK (Circadian Locomoter Output Cycles Kaput) and BMAL1 (Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1), play a core role in this feedback system, working as one heterodimer6. Additionally, there is evidence7,8 showing that both oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes are regulated by CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells, which indicates regulatory roles of those two proteins in cancers.The RHO family, a group of small GTPases, participates in the mediation of multiple processes of tumor progression, including the processes of cell transformation, cytokinesis, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix deposition, and tumor cell dissemination9. RHOA (Ras Homolog Family Member A), a member of the RHO family, promotes the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions through actin鈥搈yosin contractility control, thereby regulating cell shape, attachment, and motility10,11. Like many other RHO family members, the function of RHOA is regulated by GEFs (guanine nucleotide exchange factors), GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins), and GDIs (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors). GEFs catalyze GDP-to-GTP exchange (activation), while GAPs stimulate GTP hydrolysis (inactivation). GDIs sequester RHOA in the cytoplasm, preventing its further interaction with other downstream effectors12. As a downstream effector of RHOA, ROCK (Rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinase) plays vital roles in facilitating actomyosin cytoskeleton contractility13. Activated ROCK promotes actin organization by phosphorylating several downstream target proteins during mitosis, including actin-depolymerizing factor CFL (cofilin), MLC (myosin light chain), and LIM kinase14. When phosphorylated by the RHOA-ROCK pathway, CFL is inactivated, leading to polymerization of G-actin into F-actin15,16. This process can directly affect the formation of lamellipodium in cancer cells, which plays a vital role in cancer metastasis17.Although accumulating evidence has indicated critical roles of circadian rhythms and RHO family proteins, whether there is crosstalk between those two systems in tumor cells is still unclear. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that CLOCK and BMAL1 promote cytoskeletal F-actin filament formation by regulating the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway, revealing a novel mechanism of circadian genes in tumor cells.Materials and methodsCell culture and transfectionHeLa and HepG2 cells used in this research were conserved in our laboratory as previously described18,19. They were grown in Dulbecco鈥檚 modified Eagle鈥檚 medium with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone, USA) cultured in a humidified incubator (at 37鈥壜癈, 5% CO2) before transfection was performed, and the medium was changed every other day. According to the manufacturer鈥檚 protocols, all transfections were performed using the transfection reagent (#114鈥?5, jetPRIME, France) in six-well plates.Reagents and reagent kitsCycloheximide (CHX) treatment was performed 48鈥塰 after transfection, with a final concentration of 20鈥壩糶/ml for an indicated period of time, and cells in specific groups were treated with MG132 (20鈥壩糓), a proteasome inhibitor, for 6鈥塰. After that, cells were harvested and analyzed by western blotting (WB) using appropriate antibodies.For the cytosolic (C)/nuclear (N) fractionation assay, the Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Kit (P0027, Beyotime, China) was used. For the cytosolic/membrane fractionation assay, the Membrane and Cytosol Protein Extraction Kit (P0033, Beyotime, China) was purchased. All experiments were repeated at least three times unless stated otherwise.Expression plasmids, short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), and antibodiesDNA fragments containing the open reading frame encoding FLAG-tagged RHOA, HA-tagged CLOCK, and HA-tagged BMAL1 were constructed and inserted into pcDNA3.1(+) expression plasmids (Invitrogen, Waltham, USA); FLAG-tagged CUL3 and FLAG-tagged RhoGDI were constructed and inserted into pENTER expression plasmids (Vigene Biosciences, Jinan, China); shRNAs for BMAL1, CLOCK, RHOA, and CUL3 were constructed and cloned into pGPU6/GFP/Neo (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). The target sequences for shRNAs were as follows: BMAL1 shRNA (shBMAL1): 5鈥?CUAUGAGAUUCCUCAACUACAGAAG-3鈥? CLOCK shRNA (shCLOCK): 5鈥?AATGGGAAACGCTACTTCGAA-3鈥? RHOA shRNA (shRHOA): 5鈥?GGAAAGAGCUGCAUAUUAATT-3鈥? NC shRNA (shNC): 5鈥?UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3鈥? siRNA (siCUL3 #1): 5鈥?GCGAGAAGAUGUACUAAAUTT-3鈥? siRNA (siCUL3 #2): 5鈥?GGCAAACUCUAUUGGAUAUTT-3鈥? and siRNA (siCUL3 #3): 5鈥? GACCGUCUCUUUAAACAAATT-3鈥?The antibodies used in the WB and coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments are listed below: mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody and mouse monoclonal anti-HA antibody were from Zen BioScience (Zen BioScience, Chengdu, China). Goat polyclonal anti-CLOCK antibody and goat polyclonal anti-BMAL1 antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Danvers, USA). Mouse polyclonal anti-RHOA antibody, mouse monoclonal anti-Rho GDI antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-HA antibody, mouse monoclonal anti-ROCK2 antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-ROCK1, mouse monoclonal anti-CFL antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-p-CFL (Ser3) antibody, and mouse monoclonal anti-CUL3 antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH was purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).Co-IP and WBUniversal protein extraction buffer (#PP1801, Bioteke, China) with protease inhibitor (#04693116001, Roche, Switzerland) was used to lyse cells transfected with designated plasmids for 48鈥塰. The lysate was subjected to IP with protein A鈥?鈥塆 agarose beads (#P2012, Beyotime, China) and specified antibodies. Co-IP proteins were further separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and detected using corresponding primary antibodies and secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), after which the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (#IPVH00010, Millipore, USA). Proteins were visualized using an Immobile Western Chemiluminescence HRP Substrate Kit (#WBKLS0100, Millipore, USA).RHOA activity assayActivated RHOA was pulled down using the GST-rhotekin-Rho-binding domain (GST-RBD) that specifically binds activated RHOA (#BK036-S, cytoskeleton, USA). In brief, cells stimulated with agonists or GTP纬S for the indicated durations were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), lysed with 500鈥壩糽 cell lysis buffer, and then centrifuged at 10,000鈥塺pm for 5鈥塵in. Equal volumes of supernatants were incubated with Rhotekin-RBD affinity beads for 1鈥塰 at 4鈥壜癈, followed by two washes in lysis buffer and three washes in the supplied wash buffer. Bound proteins were eluted in 3脳 1% SDS sample buffer and examined by 10% SDS-PAGE and WB analysis using the anti-RHOA antibody.Immunofluorescence stainingCells were first fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (#P1110, Solarbio, USA) in PBS for 10鈥?5鈥塵in and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (#T8200, Solarbio, USA) for 5鈥塵in. Then the cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (#A8010, Solarbio, USA) for 30鈥?5鈥塵in. Fixed cells were incubated overnight at 4鈥壜癈 with specific primary antibodies. Finally, the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor庐 350 (#A10039, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), Alexa Fluor庐 555 (#A-31570, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and Alexa Fluor庐 488 (#A-11055, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for 2鈥塰 at room temperature. Each step was followed by three 5-min washes in PBS. DAPI (4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; #D9542, Sigma, USA) was used for nuclear staining. Fluorescent images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Japan).For F-action staining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100. The cells were then incubated with 5鈥壩糶/ml phalloidin for 1鈥塰 in the dark. Then DAPI was used for nuclear staining.Quantitative PCRQuantitative PCR was performed with a CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, USA) using SYBR green PCR Mastermix (#SR1110, Solarbio, USA). The mean values of the results were analyzed and normalized against the housekeeping gene 尾-actin.In vitro binding assaysThe TNT庐 Quick Coupled in Vitro Transcription/Translation System (#REFL1171, Promega, USA) was used for protein interaction analysis in vitro with circular plasmid DNAs containing the T7 promoter. The CLOCK-expressing plasmid (CLOCK-pcDNA3.1-HA), BMAL1-expressing plasmid (BMAL1-pcDNA3.1-HA), RhoGDI-expressing plasmid (RhoGDI-pENTER-FLAG), and RHOA-expressing plasmid (RHOA-pcDNA3.1-FLAG) were used in this research. In vitro protein coexpression assays for CLOCK/BMAL1/RHOA, CLOCK/RhoGDI/RHOA, and RhoGDI/BMAL1/RHOA were carried out separately in three reactions using the TNT庐 system. One microgram of total plasmid DNA was diluted in 50鈥壩糽 and incubated at 30鈥壜癈 for 1.5鈥塰. Then 2鈥壩糽 of each product was used to detect the protein expression of CLOCK/BMAL1 and RHOA by WB with specific antibodies. Subsequently, 30鈥壩糽 of each translated protein was mixed together in 200鈥壩糽 lysis buffer for Co-IP assays.Actin segmentation by ultracentrifugationCells were lysed directly in the dish using RIPA lysate (#P0013B, Beyotime, China) with 1% phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (#ST506, Beyotime, China) for 30鈥塵in on ice before being collected into 1.5鈥塵l Eppendorf tubes. Then the cell lysates were separated by ultracentrifugation at 15,000鈥壝椻€?i>g for 30鈥塵in at 4鈥壜癈. The supernatant containing G-actin was removed to a fresh tube, while the pellet containing F-actin was resuspended in cold 1脳 PBS before being ultracentrifuged at 15,000鈥壝椻€?i>g for 5鈥塵in twice. After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in F-actin extracting solution (1.5鈥塵M guanidine hydrochloride, 1鈥塵M sodium acetate, 1鈥塵M CaCl2, 1鈥塵M ATP, 20鈥塵M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) for 1鈥塰 on ice to dissolve F-actin before being ultracentrifuged at 15,000鈥壝椻€?i>g for 30鈥塵in at 4鈥壜癈. Then both F-actin and G-actin became 尾-actin monomers, which was detected using an antibody against 尾-actin by WB.Cell proliferation assayCell proliferation was performed using a WST-8 Cell Counting Kit-8 (#C0038, Beyotime, China) according to the manufacturer鈥檚 instructions. The absorbance at 450鈥塶m was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek, VT, USA). The relative proliferation ratio was calculated by absorbance and normalized to the absorbance of a control that was given an arbitrary value of one.Cell migration and invasion assaysFor the cell migration assay, the appropriate number of cells for 100% confluence in 24鈥塰 was plated in a 6-well plate. We pressed a 200-渭l pipette tip firmly against the top of the tissue culture plate and swiftly made a vertical wound through the cell monolayer in the biosafety hood. Snapshot pictures were analyzed by measuring the distance from one side of the wound to the other to clearly show wound closure over time using a scatter plot or bar graph. A fluorescence inverse microscope (Olympus, Japan) was used to capture the images. For the cell invasion assay, transfected cells in serum-free medium were plated in a Biocoat Matrigel invasion chamber with 5% FBS in media and incubated overnight. Finally, cells were fixed in methanol for 10鈥塵in and stained with Wright鈥揋iemsa (Jiancheng Biotech, Nanjing, China).Data availabilityThe data shown in Fig.聽8a are available on the Oncomine database, http://www.oncomine.org.Statistical analysisAll experiments were repeated three times. WB results were quantified with the ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d. Statistical analysis was performed by applying GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) and Student鈥檚 t-test. Values of p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 were considered significant and indicated by asterisks in the figures.ResultsCLOCK and BMAL1 stimulate the formation of F-actinTo determine the functional role of CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells, two types of shRNAs (shCLOCK and shBMAL1 for short) were used to attenuate CLOCK and BMAL1 expression, and the CLOCK-expressing plasmid CLOCK-pcDNA3.1-HA and the BMAL1-expressing plasmid BMAL1-pcDNA3.1-HA (CLOCK+ and BMAL1+ for short) were used to increase their levels.Characterization of CLOCK and BMAL1 overexpression in HepG2 cells by fluorescent phalloidin staining showed that actin filaments were elongated and thus became more prominent. Meanwhile, the stress fibers observed in CLOCK knockdown and BMAL1 knockdown cells were apparently shortened and weakened (Fig.聽1a, b). Moreover, the F-actin and G-actin extraction assays were conducted to measure the F-actin turnover. The CLOCK+ and BMAL1+ groups in HeLa cells had a significantly higher F-actin to G-actin ratio than the group, while the shBMAL1 group had a significantly lower ratio of F-actin to G-actin than the control group (Fig.聽1c). These findings suggest that CLOCK and BMAL1 may play key roles in the formation of the actin cytoskeleton.Fig. 1: CLOCK and BMAL1 enhance the formation of F-actin.a, b F-actin was stained with TRITC-phalloidin (Red) in HepG2 cells transfected with HA-tagged BMAL1 (BMAL1+), HA-tagged CLOCK (CLOCK+), shRNA for BMAL1 (shBMAL1), and CLOCK (shCLOCK) vectors. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. The scale bars represent 10鈥壩糾. The F-actin levels were quantified with the fluorescence intensity ratio using ImageJ. The fluorescence intensity of the control was taken as 1. Data were analyzed using a t test (n鈥?鈥?) and presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d; *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. c F-actin and G-actin from control, shBMAL1, BMAL1+, shCLOCK, and CLOCK+ HeLa cells were separated by ultraspeed centrifugation and analyzed by western blotting using an antibody against 尾-actin. The mean ratio of F-actin to G-actin and SD were plotted, and a t test was performed (n鈥?鈥?); n.s. not significant; *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. d, e The expression levels of CLOCK and BMAL1 were verified by western blotting in HeLa and HepG2 cells transfected with the corresponding plasmids, respectively. GAPDH was used as a loading control, and the protein level of the control was taken as 1. Data were analyzed using a t test (n鈥?鈥?) and presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d; *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01Full size imageCLOCK and BMAL1 abundance were verified by WB using antibodies that recognize CLOCK or BMAL1 in HeLa and HepG2 cells, respectively (Fig.聽1d, e). The shNC plasmid and pcDNA3.1(+) vector were used as controls for knockdown and overexpression assays, respectively, and only the pcDNA3.1(+) vector was used as the control in subsequent experiments, as no differences were detected between the shNC plasmid and pcDNA3.1(+) vector-transfected groups.CLOCK and BMAL1 interact with RHOATo further investigate the roles of the circadian core protein CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells, we performed immunofluorescence assays and found that both endogenous CLOCK (red) and BMAL1 (red) overlapped with RHOA (green), mainly in the cytoplasm (Fig.聽2a). Next, Co-IP assays were performed to investigate the physiologically relevant protein鈥損rotein interactions, and the results showed that both endogenous CLOCK and BMAL1 can bind with RHOA in HeLa and HepG2 cells (Fig.聽2b). The Co-IP assays using the cytosolic (C) and nuclear (N) fractions further determined that CLOCK and BMAL1 bind with RHOA mostly in the cytoplasm (Fig.聽2c). To investigate whether BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA can form a complex, immunofluorescence assays were conducted, and the results showed that BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA were colocalized mostly in the cytoplasm (Fig.聽S1).Fig. 2: CLOCK and BMAL1 interact with RHOA.a Immunofluorescent staining of endogenous BMAL1/CLOCK (red) and RHOA (green) in HeLa and HepG2 cells. Blue color represents the nucleus stained with DAPI. The scale bars represent 10鈥壩糾. b The complex was immunoprecipitated from total protein extracts collected from HeLa and HepG2 cells. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against BMAL1, CLOCK, or RHOA. c Cytosolic (C) and nuclear (N) fractionation followed by Co-IP were performed in HeLa cells. d The TNT庐 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System was used for protein expression in vitro. The synthesized proteins were then analyzed by Co-IP with antibodies against BMAL1, CLOCK, or RHOA. e Two-step IP assay. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody, and then BMAL1-HA and the associated proteins were eluted with 4鈥壝椻€塇A peptide (30鈥壩糾ol/渭l)Full size imageNext, to examine the direct interaction among BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA, the TNT庐 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation (TNT) System was used for protein expression in vitro. Coexpressed BMAL, CLOCK, and RHOA were then subjected to IP. The results indicated that BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA can directly bind to each other in vitro (Fig.聽2d), suggesting that BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA can form a complex. Taken together, these results led to the speculation that BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA could form a complex, and a two-step IP assay was performed to verify this hypothesis (Fig.聽2e).CLOCK and BMAL1 upregulate RHOA at the protein levelAs we have shown that both CLOCK and BMAL1 can interact with RHOA, we then sought to determine whether CLOCK or BMAL1 regulate the expression of RHOA. Immunofluorescent staining showed that overexpression of CLOCK or BMAL1 increased the amount of RHOA (red) in HeLa cells. In control and CLOCK-overexpressing cells, RHOA was mainly expressed in the cytosol. Interestingly, when BMAL1 was overexpressed, RHOA was localized in both the cytosol and nucleus, suggesting that BMAL1 can regulate RHOA localization as well as its expression (Fig.聽3a). Additionally, WB results showed that overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 upregulated RHOA expression at the protein level in HeLa and HepG2 cells. Meanwhile, CLOCK and BMAL1 knockdown inhibited RHOA expression at the protein level in HeLa and HepG2 cells (Fig.聽3b, c). Then quantitative real-time PCR was performed to detect the expression level of RHOA mRNA in HeLa and HepG2 cells, and no significant changes in RHOA mRNA levels were detected after BMAL1 or CLOCK expression was altered (Fig.聽3d).Fig. 3: CLOCK and BMAL1 upregulate the expression of RHOA protein.a Immunofluorescent staining of RHOA (Red) in BMAL1+, control, and CLOCK+ HeLa cells (left panel). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. The scale bars represent 10鈥壩糾. The quantification of RHOA was performed with ImageJ and analyzed (right panel) **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. b, c Expression of RHOA at the protein level was examined using western blotting in shBMAL1, BMAL1+, shCLOCK, and CLOCK+ HeLa cells. RHOA expression was quantified with ImageJ and then normalized to GAPDH expression. The protein level of the control was taken as 1. Data were analyzed using a t test (n鈥?鈥?) and presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d; *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. d Expression of RHOA at the mRNA level was examined by qPCR in shBMAL1, BMAL1+, shCLOCK, and CLOCK+ cells. Data are presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d (n鈥?鈥?); n.s. not significantFull size imageCLOCK and BMAL1 block CUL3-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of RHOAThe results above indicate that neither CLOCK nor BMAL1 affect RHOA mRNA expression, which implies that CLOCK and BMAL1 may regulate RHOA expression by affecting protein degradation. We then measured RHOA protein stability in cells transfected with CLOCK or BMAL1 shRNA vectors and treated with 20鈥壩糶/ml CHX to inhibit protein synthesis. WB results showed that CLOCK and BMAL1 knockdown led to a significant increase in RHOA degradation (Fig.聽4a, b). The downregulation of RHOA by BMAL1 or CLOCK knockdown was restored by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, indicating that CLOCK and BMAL1 can inhibit the proteasome-mediated degradation of RHOA (Fig.聽4c). Additionally, a ubiquitination assay was performed, illustrating an increase in RHOA ubiquitination levels induced by CLOCK and BMAL1 knockdown (Fig.聽4d).Fig. 4: CLOCK and BMAL1 block CUL3-mediated RHOA ubiquitin degradation.a, b Stability analysis of RHOA protein. a HeLa and HepG2 cells transfected with shNC, shBMAL1, or shCLOCK were treated with cycloheximide (20鈥壩糶/ml) for the indicated duration before harvesting. Expression of RHOA was detected by western blotting. b RHOA expression was quantified with ImageJ and then normalized to GAPDH expression. The protein level at 0鈥塰 was taken as 1. c Cells were treated as indicated, and the concentration of MG132 used was 20鈥壩糓. Data are presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d (n鈥?鈥?); *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01; n.s. not significant. d The ubiquitination levels of RHOA were analyzed by Co-IP assay. HeLa cells transfected with HA-ubiquitin (Ub) were treated with 20鈥壩糓 MG132 for 6鈥塰 before harvesting. Data are presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d (n鈥?鈥?); *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01; n.s. not significant. e The efficiency of siCUL3 was tested with a western blot assay. siCUL3 #2 siRNA was selected for later experiments. f The complex was immunoprecipitated from total protein extracts collected from HeLa cells transfected with corresponding plasmids. The proteins were then analyzed by Co-IP with antibodies against CUL3. g The expression of RHOA was verified by western blotting in HeLa cells transfected with corresponding plasmidsFull size imagePrevious literature20,21,22 reported that the E3 ubiquitin ligase CUL3, a cullin family scaffold protein, can affect the stability of the RHOA protein and induce RHOA ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Therefore, we assumed that CLOCK and BMAL1 may suppress the ubiquitination of RHOA that is induced by CUL3. First, we measured the increased RHOA protein abundance induced by CUL3 knockdown (Fig.聽4e). We further confirmed that this interaction between CUL3 and RHOA was potentiated in CLOCK- and BMAL1-knockdown cells and decreased in CLOCK- and BMAL1-overexpressing cells, indicating that CLOCK and BMAL1 compete with CUL3 in their interaction with RHOA (Fig.聽4f). Additionally, CUL3 knockdown restored the decrease in RHOA induced by CLOCK and BMAL1 (Fig.聽4g). These results indicated that CLOCK and BMAL1 can inhibit the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of RHOA by suppressing the interaction between CUL3 and RHOA.CLOCK and BMAL1 block the interaction between RHOA and GDI to activate the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathwayPrevious research has shown that RhoGDIs can inactivate RHOA, resulting in the passive localization of RHOA to the cytoplasm, where it is sequestered and its activation or interaction with effectors are prevented23,24. To further prove whether CLOCK and BMAL1 can regulate the interaction between GDI and RHOA, Co-IP assays were employed, and the results revealed that CLOCK and BMAL1 reduced the interaction between RHOA and RhoGDI (Fig.聽5a). Both CLOCK and BMAL1 are indicated to be able to compete with RhoGDI toward RHOA in cells. To investigate the direct combination in vitro when CLOCK/RhoGDI/RHOA and BMAL1/RhoGDI/RHOA are coexpressed, we synthesized the proteins BMAL1, CLOCK, RHOA, and RHOGDI in vitro using the TNT庐 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System. The synthesized proteins were then analyzed by Co-IP with suitable antibodies. The results showed that RHOA bound directly to RHOGDI, CLOCK, or BMAL1 when they were coexpressed in vitro (Fig.聽5b). The membrane (M)/cytosolic (C) fractionation assays further confirmed that knockdown of CLOCK and BMAL1 can attenuate the localization of RHOA on the cell membrane in HeLa cells (Fig.聽5c). Notably, the effects of BMAL1 and CLOCK overexpression in this assay were both mild, potentially due to the intrinsically high endogenous expression of BMAL1 and CLOCK in cancer cells.Fig. 5: CLOCK and BMAL1 regulate the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway.a The complex was immunoprecipitated from total protein extracts collected from HeLa cells transfected with corresponding plasmids. The proteins were then analyzed by Co-IP with antibodies against RhoGDI. b The TNT庐 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System was used here for protein (BMAL1, CLOCK, RHOA, and RHOGDI) synthesis. The synthesized proteins were then analyzed by Co-IP with corresponding antibodies. c The RHOA distribution was affected by BMAL1 or CLOCK, as detected by a cytosolic/membrane fractionation assay in HeLa cells. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01, n.s. no significant. d HeLa cells transfected with the indicated vectors were harvested and analyzed using a 96-well ROCK Activity Assay Kit. The activity levels were normalized to those in the control, which was given an arbitrary value of 1 **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. e CLOCK and BMAL1 can promote the activation of RHOA and the expression of RHOA and other proteins involved in the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway. Activated RHOA was pulled down using a GST-Rhotekin-Rho-binding domain (RBD) fusion protein. f Immunofluorescent staining of p-cofilin (Ser-3) in HeLa cells transfected with BMAL1+, CLOCK+, shBMAL1, and shCLOCK. Scale bar, 5鈥壜祄. g HeLa cells transfected with the indicated plasmids were treated with 1鈥壩糶/ml CT04 (RHOA inhibitor) for 2鈥塰 and Y27632 (ROCK inhibitor) for 20鈥塰 before whole-cell lysates were extracted and analyzed. Statistical results of the p-cofilin protein level are shown to the right *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01, n.s. no significantFull size imageTo investigate whether CLOCK and BMAL1 regulate ROCK activity as downstream effectors of RHOA, we then determined the ROCK kinase activity influenced by CLOCK and BMAL1 in HeLa cells. The results showed that ROCK kinase activity was significantly increased in CLOCK- and BMAL1-overexpressing cells and decreased in CLOCK- and BMAL1-knockdown cells (Fig.聽5d). WB results further showed that overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 upregulated the activity of RHOA and the expression level of RHOA and its downstream proteins (ROCK and p-CFL) (Fig.聽5e). The immunofluorescence assays further confirmed that overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 can enhance the level of Ser3-phosphorylated CFL (Fig.聽5f).The results above suggest that CLOCK and BMAL1 may regulate the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway. Next, Y27632 (the inhibitor of ROCK) and CT04 (the inhibitor of RHOA) were used to treat the cells, and the levels of phosphorylated CFL were tested. The results indicated that, in the presence of Y27632 or CT04, the effects of BMAL1 or CLOCK overexpression on CFL were attenuated (Fig.聽5g).CLOCK and BMAL1 positively regulate F-actin filaments via RHOACFL is the key F-actin regulator in spines, and its silencing leads to defects in spine morphology and function. The activity of CFL is tightly restricted by its phosphorylation (Ser3)25,26,27. As shown in Fig.聽5, the overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 can promote the phosphorylation of CFL to downregulate its activity, thereby decreasing its ability to cut actin filaments and inhibiting the depolymerization of actin filaments. RHOA abundance was verified by WB using antibodies that recognize RHOA in HeLa cells (Fig.聽6a). Immunofluorescence staining showed that overexpression of RHOA promoted a significant decrease in F-actin-to-G-actin ratio in response to CLOCK/BMAL1 knockdown. Meanwhile, RHOA knockdown significantly inhibited the increase in F actin-to-G-actin ratio in response to overexpression of CLOCK/BMAL1 (Fig.聽6b, c). These results were confirmed by F-actin and G-actin extraction assays (Fig.聽6d). Together, these findings revealed that CLOCK and BMAL1 regulate F-actin filament formation, at least partially, through the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway.Fig. 6: CLOCK and BMAL1 enhance F-actin filaments via the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway.a RHOA abundance was verified by western blotting in RHOA overexpression (RHOA+), RHOA knockdown (shRHOA), and control HeLa cells. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d (n鈥?鈥?); *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. b, c F-actin was stained with TRITC-phalloidin (Red) in HepG2 cells transfected with vectors. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. The scale bars represent 10鈥壩糾. The F-actin levels were quantified with the fluorescence intensity ratio using ImageJ. The fluorescence intensity of the control was taken as 1. Data were analyzed using a t test (n鈥?鈥?) and presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d; *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01. d F-actin and G-actin from HeLa cells were segmented by ultraspeed centrifugation and analyzed by western blotting using an antibody against 尾-actin. The data were quantified using ImageJ. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05; **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01, n.s. not significantFull size imageCLOCK and BMAL1 can promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via RHOACell proliferation, migration, and invasion are very useful and important for normal development, immune response, and disease processes, such as cancer metastasis and inflammation. Thus, to examine whether CLOCK and BMAL1 can promote tumor cell proliferation via RHOA, the Cell Counting Kit-8 assays were introduced to observe cell proliferation in HeLa cells. Enhanced cell proliferation induced by BMAL1 or CLOCK overexpression was observed and was attenuated by RHOA knockdown (Fig.聽7a). Here we also examined tumor cell migration and invasion using two related assays to measure cancer metastasis. Scratch wound healing assay and transwell assay were used to analyze the ability of single cells to directionally respond to various chemoattractants. The results demonstrated that overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 markedly promoted cell migration and invasion, which was also attenuated by RHOA knockdown (Fig.聽7b, c). These results suggested that CLOCK and BMAL1 can promote tumor cell migration and invasion through RHOA.Fig. 7: CLOCK and BMAL1 promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.a The cell viability of HeLa cells was determined by Cell Counting Kit-8 assay after plasmid transfection. The results were normalized to the control group (mean鈥壜扁€塖D, n鈥?鈥?). b Representative pictures of the scratch wound healing assay. During a 48-h wound closure assay, pictures were taken every 24鈥塰 using a time-lapse microscope. Representative pictures at 0, 24, and 48鈥塰 are shown. The distance of the wound was measured, and two line charts were used to display the width of the wound over time. Data were analyzed using a t test (n鈥?鈥?) and presented as the mean鈥壜扁€塻d. c Representative microscopic images of cells that migrated through the transwell in the migration assay. After cell migration and staining with crystal violet, pictures of the migrated cells (purple stained) were taken using a microscope. **p鈥?lt;鈥?.01Full size imageTo investigate the clinical significance of CLOCK, BMAL1, and RHOA expression in tumor cells, we compared CLOCK, BMAL1, and RHOA expression between normal human liver and liver carcinoma tissues using the Oncomine database (http://www.oncomine.org). These data indicated that CLOCK, BMAL1, and RHOA were all upregulated in liver carcinoma when compared with the expression in normal liver tissues (Fig.聽8a). The link identified in our research between BMAL1, CLOCK, and Rho GTPase activity presents an innovative therapeutic targeting strategy of Rho GTPase in cancer.Fig. 8: A schematic of the regulation of the RHOA-ROCK-CFL pathway by CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells.a Analysis of BMAL1, CLOCK, and RHOA in liver cancer (ONCOMINE database). Box plots derived from gene expression data in ONCOMINE in normal and liver cancer tissue. The p value was set up at 0.01, and the fold change was defined as 2; LC liver cancer. b A schematic diagram depicting the regulatory effects of CLOCK and BMAL1 on F-actin/G-actin turnover and its role in cell proliferation, migration, and invasionFull size imageDiscussionCLOCK and BMAL1 are traditionally considered to be two transcription factors that play core roles by forming CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers. These molecules initiate target gene transcription by binding to the promoter regions of the genes in mammals28,29. Nevertheless, our data provide novel mechanistic insight into circadian genes as a regulator to inhibit CUL3-mediated RHOA ubiquitination and suppress the binding of RhoGDIs to RHOA. These findings showed that CLOCK and BMAL1 can directly interact with the kinase pathway in addition to their traditional transcription activation function. Notably, we have provided evidence that, in this mechanism, CLOCK and BMAL1 still work together in one complex, and each of these two proteins positively affect RHOA activity. However, the question of whether their function depends on the heterodimer or whether they are able to function separately requires further investigation.Our present results showed that overexpression of CLOCK or BMAL1 increased the amount of RHOA in HeLa cells (Fig.聽3). Interestingly, BMAL1 overexpression more effectively regulated RHOA localization and expression than did CLOCK overexpression. A previous study30 showed that inflammation and necrosis factors are likely to induce the translocation of RHOA into the nucleus. However, the role of nuclear-located RHOA is still unclear.Additionally, we found that CLOCK and BMAL1 affect the degradation of RHOA by affecting the binding to the E3 ligase, CUL3. The interaction between CUL3 and RHOA increased in CLOCK- or BMAL1-knockdown cells and decreased in CLOCK- or BMAL1-overexpressing cells, indicating that CLOCK and BMAL1 compete with CUL3 to bind RHOA and regulate F-actin dynamics.Previous studies have shown that actin dynamics exhibit circadian regulation in some peripheral tissues in vivo and are proposed to regulate the activity of the core circadian clock complex in response to systemic cues31,32. In addition to timekeeping, clock genes have also been shown to have rhythmic functions associated with cytoskeleton regulation. Nathaniel et al.33 revealed that the cellular clock regulates cell migration through circadian control of cytoskeletal dynamics in fibroblasts, and Afroditi et al.34 demonstrated that rhythms in RHOA activity are controlled by clock-regulated transcription of puratrophin-1-like (Pura). However, our previous study indicated that the expression of CLOCK and BMAL1 demonstrate no circadian rhythmicity in tumor cells35.In summary, our present research illustrates a novel insight into the circadian clock proteins, CLOCK and BMAL1, which can promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cancer cells by affecting the formation of F-actin. This presupposition was supported by two lines of evidence in our study. First, the overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 affected the levels of RHOA by blocking the degradation of RHOA. Second, the overexpression of CLOCK and BMAL1 affected the active state of RHOA by preventing the inactivation of RHOA (Fig.聽8b). Considering that F-actin filament dynamics are involved in a variety of significant bioprocesses, our current research provides a new perspective on the roles of CLOCK and BMAL1 in tumor cells. References1.Lande-Diner, L., Boyault, C., Kim, J. Y. Weitz, C. J. A positive feedback loop links circadian clock factor CLOCK-BMAL1 to the basic transcriptional machinery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16021鈥?6026 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 2.Papagiannakopoulos, T. et al. Circadian rhythm disruption promotes lung tumorigenesis. Cell Metab. 24, 324鈥?31 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 3.Masri, S., Kinouchi, K. Sassone-Corsi, P. Circadian clocks, epigenetics, and cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 27, 50鈥?6 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 4.Savvidis, C. Koutsilieris, M. Circadian rhythm disruption in cancer biology. Mol. Med. 18, 1249鈥?260 (2012).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 5.Lamia, K. A. Ticking time bombs: connections between circadian clocks and cancer. F1000Res. 6, 1910 (2017).Article聽Google Scholar聽 6.Reilly, D. F., Westgate, E. J. FitzGerald, G. A. Peripheral circadian clocks in the vasculature. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27, 1694鈥?705 (2007).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 7.Mullenders, J. et al. A large scale shRNA barcode screen identifies the circadian clock component ARNTL as putative regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway. PLoS ONE 4, e4798 (2009).Article聽Google Scholar聽 8.Jiang, W. et al. The circadian clock gene Bmal1 acts as a potential anti-oncogene in pancreatic cancer by activating the p53 tumor suppressor pathway. Cancer Lett. 371, 314鈥?25 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 9.O鈥機onnor, K. Chen, M. Dynamic functions of RhoA in tumor cell migration and invasion. Small GTPases 4, 141鈥?47 (2013).Article聽Google Scholar聽 10.Chiba, S., Enami, T., Ogawa, S. Sakata-Yanagimoto, M. G17V RHOA: genetic evidence of GTP-unbound RHOA playing a role in tumorigenesis in T cells. Small GTPases 6, 100鈥?03 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 11.Nomikou, E., Stournaras, C. Kardassis, D. Functional analysis of the promoters of the small GTPases RhoA and RhoB in embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 491, 754鈥?59 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 12.Cherfils, J. Zeghouf, M. Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. Physiol. Rev. 93, 269鈥?09 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 13.Julian, L. Olson, M. F. Rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinases (ROCK): structure, regulation, and functions. Small GTPases 5, e29846 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 14.Duan, X. et al. Rho-GTPase effector ROCK phosphorylates cofilin in actin-meditated cytokinesis during mouse oocyte meiosis. Biol. Reprod. 90, 37 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 15.Maekawa, M. et al. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285, 895鈥?98 (1999).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 16.Katoh, K. et al. Rho-kinase鈥搈ediated contraction of isolated stress fibers. J. Cell Biol. 153, 569鈥?83 (2001).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 17.Shi, C. et al. Yap promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis and mobilization via governing cofilin/F-actin/lamellipodium axis by regulation of JNK/Bnip3/SERCA/CaMKII pathways. Redox Biol. 14, 59鈥?1 (2017).Article聽Google Scholar聽 18.Tan, H. et al. HILI destabilizes microtubules by suppressing phosphorylation and Gigaxonin-mediated degradation of TBCB. Sci. Rep. 7, 46376 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 19.Jiang, S. et al. Piwil2 inhibits keratin 8 degradation through promoting p38-induced phosphorylation to resist Fas-mediated apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 3928鈥?938 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 20.Deng, S. Huang, C. E3 ubiquitin ligases in regulating stress fiber, lamellipodium, and focal adhesion dynamics. Cell Adh. Migr. 8, 49鈥?4 (2014).Article聽Google Scholar聽 21.Chen, Y. et al. Cullin mediates degradation of RhoA through evolutionarily conserved BTB adaptors to control actin cytoskeleton structure and cell movement. Mol. Cell 35, 841鈥?55 (2009).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 22.Pelham, C. J. et al. Cullin-3 regulates vascular smooth muscle function and arterial blood pressure via PPARgamma and RhoA/Rho-kinase. Cell Metab. 16, 462鈥?72 (2012).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 23.Filina, J. V., Gabdoulkhakova, A. G. Safronova, V. G. RhoA/ROCK downregulates FPR2-mediated NADPH oxidase activation in mouse bone marrow granulocytes. Cell. Signal. 26, 2138鈥?146 (2014).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 24.Marjoram, R. J., Lessey, E. C. Burridge, K. Regulation of RhoA activity by adhesion molecules and mechanotransduction. Curr. Mol. Med. 14, 199鈥?08 (2014).25.Hotulainen, P. et al. Defining mechanisms of actin polymerization and depolymerization during dendritic spine morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 185, 323鈥?39 (2009).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 26.Rust, M. B. ADF/cofilin: a crucial regulator of synapse physiology and behavior. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 3521鈥?529 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 27.Ohashi, K. Roles of cofilin in development and its mechanisms of regulation. Dev. Growth Differ. 57, 275鈥?90 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 28.Menet, J. S., Pescatore, S. Rosbash, M. CLOCK:BMAL1 is a pioneer-like transcription factor. Genes Dev. 28, 8鈥?3 (2014).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 29.Lee, Y., Chun, S. K. Kim, K. Sumoylation controls CLOCK-BMAL1-mediated clock resetting via CBP recruitment in nuclear transcriptional foci. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1853, 2697鈥?708 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 30.Li, Y., Chen, Y., Tao, Y., Xu, Z. Chen, M. RhoA protein is generally distributed in the nuclei of cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 24, 1005鈥?009 (2010).31.Yang, N. et al. Cellular mechano-environment regulates the mammary circadian clock. Nat. Commun. 8, 14287 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 32.Gerber, A. et al. Blood-borne circadian signal stimulates daily oscillations in actin dynamics and SRF activity. Cell 152, 492鈥?03 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 33.Hoyle, N. P. et al. Circadian actin dynamics drive rhythmic fibroblast mobilization during wound healing. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal2774 (2017).Article聽Google Scholar聽 34.Petsakou, A., Sapsis, T. P. Blau, J. Circadian rhythms in Rho1 activity regulate neuronal plasticity and network hierarchy. Cell 162, 823鈥?35 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽Google Scholar聽 35.Lu, Y. et al. Cancer/testis antigen PIWIL2 suppresses circadian rhythms by regulating the stability and activity of BMAL1 and CLOCK. Oncotarget 8, 54913鈥?4924 (2017).PubMed聽 PubMed Central聽Google Scholar聽 Download referencesAcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571381 and 31300961) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB947600).Author informationAuthor notesThese authors contributed equally: Teng-jiao Ma, Zhi-wei ZhangAffiliationsDepartment of Medical Genetics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital and Collaborative Innovation Center, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, ChinaTeng-jiao Ma,聽Zhi-wei Zhang,聽Yi-lu Lu,聽Ying-ying Zhang,聽Da-chang Tao,聽Yun-qiang Liu聽 聽Yong-xin MaAuthorsTeng-jiao MaView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarZhi-wei ZhangView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarYi-lu LuView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarYing-ying ZhangView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarDa-chang TaoView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarYun-qiang LiuView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarYong-xin MaView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarCorresponding authorCorrespondence to Yong-xin Ma.Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Additional informationPublisher\'s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Electronic supplementary material Figure S1Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article鈥檚 Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article鈥檚 Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and PermissionsAbout this articleCite this articleMa, Tj., Zhang, Zw., Lu, Yl. et al. CLOCK and BMAL1 stabilize and activate RHOA to promote F-actin formation in cancer cells. Exp Mol Med 50, 1鈥?5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0156-4Download citationReceived: 07 January 2018Revised: 20 June 2018Accepted: 22 June 2018Published: 04 October 2018Issue Date: October 2018DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0156-4 Jian Wang, Shujing Li, Xiahui Li, Bowen Li, Yanan Li, Kangkai Xia, Yuxi Yang, Sattout Aman, Miao Wang Huijian Wu Cancer Cell International (2019) Editorial SummaryCancer: Clocking the triggers for tumor progressionTwo proteins involved in regulating circadian rhythms may promote cancer tumor growth by changing the internal structures of cells. Circadian clock proteins play key roles in cell division, metabolism, and immune responses. Certain clock proteins are implicated in uncontrolled cell and tumor growth. Yong-xin Ma at Sichuan University in Chengdu, China and co-workers have shown that two clock proteins, CLOCK and BMAL1, regulate the arrangement of F-actin microfilaments in the cytoskeleton of cells. The researchers found that CLOCK and BMAL1 interact with an enzyme that promotes the formation of cellular fibers and regulates cell shape and motility. The overexpression of these clock proteins in cancers increases the levels of this enzyme, which changes F-actin structures inside cells. This promotes cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.